For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Interactive Demo

Explore the ContextQA Reporting & Analytics dashboard — track pass rates, detect flaky tests, classify failures by root cause, and share results with stakeholders.

Quick answer

Explore the ContextQA Reporting & Analytics dashboard — track pass rates, detect flaky tests, classify failures by root cause, and share results with stakeholders. Use this page to preview the workflow and its visible results before following the linked written instructions.

What this page covers

The ContextQA analytics dashboard gives teams a real-time view of test health across every execution. This demo walks through the key panels: KPI summary, daily pass rate trends, AI failure classification, and flaky test detection.

1

KPI Summary

The top row shows the four most important health metrics for the selected time period at a glance.

Metric
Value
Trend

Pass Rate

94.2%

↑ 2.1% vs last week

Total Executions

847

↑ 18% vs last week

Failures

49

↓ 12 fewer than last week

Flaky Tests

7

↑ 2 new this week

AI Agent: KPIs update in real time after every execution. Pass rate, failure count, and flaky test count are all computed automatically — no manual tagging required.

2

Daily Pass Rate Chart

The bar chart shows passed, failed, and self-healed test counts for each day in the period.

7-day breakdown (passed / failed / healed):

  • Monday: 98 / 5 / 2

  • Tuesday: 112 / 8 / 3

  • Wednesday: 89 / 12 / 1

  • Thursday: 134 / 6 / 4

  • Friday: 156 / 9 / 2

  • Saturday: 78 / 3 / 1

  • Sunday: 180 / 6 / 2

AI Agent: "Healed" counts are tests that failed on first attempt but passed after self-healing — these are tracked separately from clean passes so teams can monitor UI churn over time.

3

AI Failure Classification

Every failure is automatically classified by the AI into one of four categories — no engineer investigation needed to triage.

Classification
Count
Share

Application Bug

25

51%

Flaky Failure

14

29%

Test Bug

7

14%

Environment Issue

3

6%

AI Agent: AI classifies failures from the evidence available to the run. Treat the category as a triage recommendation and confirm it against the failed step, logs, and comparable run history before assigning ownership.

4

Flaky Test Detection ✓

ContextQA identifies tests that pass inconsistently across runs and surfaces them in a dedicated list with their flakiness rate and likely cause.

Top flaky tests this week:

Test
Flakiness
Likely Cause

Checkout — credit card payment

30%

Timing issue

Search — autocomplete results

20%

Race condition

Upload — large file (>10MB)

10%

Timeout

Email notification delivery

10%

Async timing

Capability
Detail

Failure Classification

Automatic — no manual tagging

Flaky Test Detection

Based on run variance across history

Shareable Reports

Authenticated execution URL or downloadable evidence artifacts

Stakeholder View

Portal access is required for an execution URL; a downloaded Playwright trace can be reviewed separately

1

Extended Trend View

Switch to the 30-day view for a broader picture of test health trends, regressions introduced by specific releases, and flaky test evolution over time.

AI Agent: The 30-day view aggregates the same metrics but highlights week-over-week patterns — useful for identifying which sprint introduced a regression or which area of the application has the most test churn.

2

Suite-Level Breakdown

Drill into pass rates by test suite to identify which feature areas are most stable and which need attention.

AI Agent: Suite-level filtering is available for all chart views — select a suite from the filter row to scope all KPIs and charts to that subset of tests.

3

Export & Share ✓

Share the execution URL with stakeholders who have access to the organization, or download the evidence artifacts that are available for the run. ContextQA does not currently generate a general PDF export or an unauthenticated public execution link.


Last updated

Was this helpful?